If you want to know more about protein staining:
- Gauci, V. J., Wright, E. P. & Coorssen, J. R. Quantitative proteomics: assessing the spectrum of in-gel protein detection methods. J Chem Biol 4, 3–29 (2011).
- Harris, L. R., Churchward, M. A., Butt, R. H. & Coorssen, J. R. Assessing detection methods for gel-based proteomic analyses. J Proteome Res 6, 1418–1425 (2007).
- Miller, I., Crawford, J. & Gianazza, E. Protein stains for proteomic applications: Which, when, why? Proteomics 6, 5385–5408 (2006).
and someone's protocol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2014.12.006
CBB IR fluorescence can be also used for a better sensitivity. We haven't made a protocol yet, but we want to test diffirent excitation and emission wavelenths:
excitation - 600nm (470 and 685 didn't work well)
emission - 720nm (LP filter should be ok)
ImageQuant TL - analysys is pretty straightforward, there is a good manual (link) and a youtube tutorial (https://youtu.be/sQmDEwo-R4M) , but I made a little guide:
- Run ImageQuant TL
\1.png)
- Open your gel scan (*.tiff/*.gel)
\2.png)
- Choose stepwise analysis
\3.png)
- Create lines (automatic mode works pretty well; you can change the shape of your lines on the next step if you are not satisfied with the result)
\4.png)
- Adjust (move and bend) strating and finishing lines of your gel if: starting and finishing lines are not in the gel; some parts of the gel front migrated at different speeds; there are chips/holes/spots of bromphenol blue at the edge of the gel (background subtraction is sensitive to this kind of defects)
\5.png)
- Adjust the witdh of your lanes
\6.png)
- Do the background subtraction: use rolling ball (diameter ~85 usually works fine) if your bands have the same witdh. Rubber band is less sensitive to the difference in bands' width, but is much worse at subtracting the background.
\7.png)
- Automatic band detection doesn't work well, so my advice is choose the peaks of interest manually; you can left click both on the gel scan and the gel profile (right click on a band to remove it). Consider using fixed peak width when you compare the same band on different lines.
\8.png)
- Do the MW calibration: choose the existing set of markers
\9.png)
- or create a new one by clicking on "Edit"
\10.png)
- Click "Edit/create Standards" and add the MW used in your marker mix
\11.png)
- Left Click on the line you want to use as a marker
\12.png)
- You can choose more than one marker line if you see that some lines migrated in a different way (you can also remove the marker line with a right click; sometimes adding a new line makes the calibtration worse)
\13.png)
- Use Log Curve for calibration and click compute
\15.png)
- Do the quantity calibration: right click on the bands with known amount of protein (in this case - 100, 250, 500ng) and click on Calibrate. I recommend to use four standards for in your expected range of concentration (for example, take 25, 50, 75, 100ng for the gels with 15-150ng of protein)
\17.png)
- In some concentration ranges BSA standards should fit to linear curve almost perfectly
\18.png)
- But in some cases you can also try using other functions (quadratic, for instance)

- Forcing through origin helps you estimate concentration way below your last standard
\20.png)
- Skip the normalisation step
\22.png)
- After you have completed all the steps you can jump to any step if you want to add something to your analysis
\23.png)
- N: you can add some bands
\24.png)
- Export all your data as a .txt file: choose the tab "Comparison", then "Edit" - "Export to file"
\25.png)
- Save as .txt
\26.png)
- Copy and paste the data to excel table. Rows and columns will be properly aligned
\27.png)