Materials and Notes
Order of events:
mqpar used for labeling and mixing v1
from %H-labeling we will determine the expected %H-mixing; how to the values from %H-mixing_v2 compare to expectation; how has from %H-mixing_v3 changed things? Which is more correct? From this we should establish a pipeline to assess %H-labeling and %H-mixing as well as providing a guidlinee on initial mixing proportions (presumably by mass) based on %H-labeling and protein mass/mg cell powder. We should also understand how to adjust a mixture proportions (presumably by mass) based on %H-labeling and protein mass/mg cell powder if an initial mix is not correct. Based on this understanding, we can address is adjustment of the LD288 powder is needed, make needed adjustments, and do the experiments. However, in some cases it may not be wise to adjust the powder, and may be preferable to instead compensate imprecise mixing in software by normalization (and below) - if the v3 mix is off, this will be needed.
this should allow (c) a rigorous statistical assessment of the I-DIRT performance in both screening and manual contexts and cross-comparisons of both; sufficiently compatible data (screen and manual) could also be combined, ultimately, if it improves signal detection. Apply the same to LD401 pipeline, however, as the mix cannot be adjusted (data is already collected) it may be necessary to apply normalization.